A while back we launched our company Twitter feed and we have seen great growth in number of followers. At the same time, the growth of our blog's RSS subscribers has slowed. This got me to thinking, is Twitter the RSS aggregator of the future?
Then I started thinking about myself and the fact that I haven't checked my RSS reader in quite a while, yet I have started following a lot of the same information on Twitter. Hmmm. Maybe I'm not alone?
After all, Twitter is much quicker and, to be honest, most of the people who write content I want to read will tweet about that content anyway and link to the full article. If I see something of interest, I can just click through to read the full article.
The only downside I see is that Twitter is more on the fly and if you miss something, it's not as easy to scroll back and find archived content. But maybe that's a good thing. I mean, there's way too much content out there for any person to consume, so if you're too busy to catch it when the tweet comes through, maybe you should just let it go.
Anyone else have thoughts on the use of Twitter vs. RSS? Leave them in the comments, or I guess you could just tweet about them.
Posted on
Tuesday, December 16, 2008
by Tim Wall
filed under